U.S. House of Representatives Abandons Rural America

WASHINGTON (Sept. 17, 2012) – National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson issued the following statement following U.S. House of Representatives Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s announcement of the remaining votes in the House, which does not include the 2012 Farm Bill:

“The 2008 Farm Bill expires on Sept. 30. Congress is well aware of its expiration, and sadly leadership has succumbed to political pressure and will leave with unfinished business. Aside from politics, there is no reason that the House doesn’t bring the farm bill to a floor vote. Leadership has chosen to cancel all votes in October.

“The farm bill is a critical piece of legislation to all Americans. It affects 16 million jobs and is the single largest investment in rural America. It is disappointing that leadership has chosen to leave us hanging because of political games.

“Not passing a farm bill now will make it more difficult to get something done in the lame duck session. Farmers need certainty, and without a farm bill in place, we lose that certainty. The agriculture sector is willing to do its fair share, however we need certainty in order to make business and planting decisions for the coming year.

“Other unfinished business includes reforms to the U.S. postal service and issues related to the sequestration process or ‘fiscal cliff,’ which will result in severe cuts to many non-defense programs.”

National Farmers Union has been working since 1902 to protect and enhance the economic well-being and quality of life for family farmers, ranchers and rural communities through advocating grassroots-driven policy positions adopted by its membership.

Farm Bill Now: Call to Action from New England Farmers Union

The House Agriculture Committee passed its version of a 2012 farm bill weeks ago on a bipartisan vote but the GOP leadership refuses to bring it to the House floor for debate.  In fact, the House GOP leadership intends to leave town next week without passing a five-year farm bill for our nation’s farmers.

Not so fast…Yesterday, Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, filed a Discharge Petition, a drastic measure that could force the leadership to bring the bill to the floor. If a majority of the House of Representatives signs the petition, the bill will be automatically be brought up for debate, amendments and a vote.
Please Call Your Representative
Ask Them to Sign the Discharge Petition

Why New England Needs a Farm Bill NOW
New England farmers need the certainty of a five-year farm bill.  Programs that support the development of local and regional food systems, beginning farmers, energy conservation, and our dairy farmers will all expire on September 30th unless the farm bill is reauthorized.

A short-term extension of the 2008 farm bill will be a costly and ineffective response to our nation’s drought and the long-term needs of our producers.  It is likely that conservation program funding would be raided to pay for a short-term extension. That would be a disaster for New England. Conservation programs are second only to nutrition in terms of farm bill dollars coming to our region.

This may be the best farm bill yet for New England.  Provisions in the House Agriculture Committee bill and the bill passed by the Senate will bring new resources to support local and regional food markets, farm based value added processing, measures to expand access to farmers markets and CSAs for low income consumers and implement historic reforms to dairy support.  Both bills provide comprehensive drought assistance for farmers.

Both bills bring new resources to the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program. Both bills also add new resources and a new Local Market Promotion purpose to the Farmer’s Market Promotion Program. The program will include support for direct marketing as well as support for local food business enterprises. Both bills include a directive to the USDA to develop insurance products appropriate to diversified crop and livestock producers.

Both bills include a regional equity provision to ensure an equitable allocation of conservation program funding for New England.  Both bills include a major overhaul of the dairy safety net by creating a new and voluntary Dairy Margin Insurance Program that provides subsidized premium coverage on the first 4 million pounds of milk.

The farm bill process must move forward. The bill passed by the House Agriculture Committee should be brought to the floor, debated, amended and passed to allow both house to begin conferencing the two bills.

Click Here to Send an Email to Your Member of Congress

Poll: Drought Conditions Add to Importance of Conservation to Farmers

This just in from National Farmers Union:

WASHINGTON (Sept. 11, 2012) – American farmers value conservation programs, particularly in times of ­­drought, and reject cutting conservation funding, according to a poll released today by National Farmers Union (NFU).

The bipartisan poll, conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research – a Democratic polling firm – and Public Opinion Strategies – a Republican polling firm – surveyed 400 American farmers across 13 Midwestern and Great Plains states on their views regarding farm bill conservation programs. The results show that farmers view conservation programs as highly important, including in a time of drought, and they strongly oppose any plan to cut conservation in order to fund short-term drought relief.

“The findings in this poll clearly show strong support for critical conservation programs that are helping to lessen the effects of the current drought,” said NFU President Roger Johnson. “Cutting funding for conservation in order to pay for a short term drought bill is detrimental to the long-term vitality of America’s agricultural land.”

The U.S. Senate passed its version of the farm bill in June in a bipartisan vote, while the U.S. House of Representatives Agriculture Committee finished its mark up of the bill in July. House leaders declined to bring the farm bill to a vote before adjourning for its month long recess in early August.

“All of this could be accomplished if Congress would pass a farm bill before Sept. 30,” said Johnson. “We would get drought assistance without having to cut conservation programs.”

The survey was conducted in Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Specific highlights of the survey include:

There is virtually no support among farmers for decreasing conservation funding. Eighty-six percent of farmers say the level of conservation funding should be maintained or increased.  Nearly half would be less likely to support a member of Congress who voted to further cut conservation funding from the farm bill.

Nearly eight in ten farmers (79 percent) believe that conservation programs are important to dealing with drought conditions.

The poll found that farmers reject a plan to pay for short-term drought relief by cutting conservation programs by a nearly two-to-one margin.

NFU worked with Cultivate Impact to produce this poll. Cultivate Impact is a new non-profit project of the Trust for Conservation Innovation specializing in strategic research and program development to help build a future with healthy and profitable farms, plentiful and accessible good food for all, and strong urban and rural communities.

National Farmers Union has been working since 1902 to protect and enhance the economic well-being and quality of life for family farmers, ranchers and rural communities through advocating grassroots-driven policy positions adopted by its membership.

Click here to view the poll results. Learn more about drought conditions in your state by clicking on the U.S. drought condition moniter .

Rural matters a lot in election, liberal columnist says

It’s all politics at the Iowa State Fair in this presidential election year, as it has been for decades. Presumptive Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan visited the fair last week, but left John Nichols of The Capital Times in Madison, Wis., wondering what he was doing there after refusing to answer questions about the epic drought that’s devastating much of the Midwest.

Nichols suggests Ryan won’t talk farm policy because farm states would likely turn against him, Mitt Romney and possibly Republican congressional candidates. Iowa, Colorado, Ohio and Wisconsin “have vast rural regions and long histories of voting with an eye toward farm, food and small-town issues,” Nichols writes. But in 2010, rural regions “swung hard to the right,” making two-thirds of all U.S. House gains by Republicans come from 125 of the most rural districts.

“Rural matters, a lot, in 2012,” Nichols concludes. “Control of the Senate will be determined by contests in states such as Maine, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio and Wisconsin. To retake the House, Democrats must win back a substantial number of the 39 rural districts that shifted to Republicans in 2010.” (Read more)

Reprinted with permission from The Rural Blog.  Article written by Ivy Brashear for The Rural Blog.  Al Cross, former Courier-Journal political writer, is director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues and The Rural Blog.

New England Farmers Union Call for Action

Just received the following communication from NEFU:

Who doesn’t love August?  The fields and farmers markets are bursting with fresh tomatoes, peppers, sweet corn, blueberries, and other fresh fruits, and vegetables. The corn, hay fields, and pastures are lush and productive, something not all farmers can say this summer.  We are fortunate here in Maine to have had adequate rain this summer for a good harvest.

August is also when Congress takes a five-week recess.  Members of Congress are home for community events and town hall forums where they rub shoulders with constituents.  August is a great opportunity to reach out to your members of Congress, and this recess you need to deliver a very strong, simple and clear message:

Congress must pass a 2012 Farm Bill by September 30.

Thirty-seven programs that support farmers markets, value added agriculture, beginning farmers, organic agriculture, renewable energy, and nutrition assistance will expire on September 30.

The Senate and the House Agriculture Committees have completed their drafts of the 2012 farm bill.  Both bills contribute to deficit reduction while supporting policies and programs essential to New England agriculture.  Both bills include critical drought relief measures for livestock producers.

The next step is to bring the House Agriculture Committee bill up for a vote on the House floor.  Once the House votes, the Senate and House Agriculture Committees can iron out differences and pass a final bill before September 30, 2012.

Please contact your member of Congress today.  Tell them that when the recess is over, they need to bring the 2012 farm bill to the House floor and pass it.  Click here for contact information.

More Farm Bill Follies: Boehner & Company

This just in from The Rural Blog: House leaders look for ways to help farm-district members after blocking floor vote on Farm Bill

“Having blocked the pending five-year Farm Bill, House Republican leaders now appear to be racing ahead of their own Agriculture Committee to come up with some alternative to protect the party’s farm state candidates during the upcoming August recess,” David Rogers reports for Politico. “Disaster aid for livestock producers hard hit by the current drought was one option under discussion Tuesday, as well as a one-year extension of the current law due to expire Sept. 30.”

“Farmers are wondering why the stall on that and what the Farm Bill will offer,” said House Speaker John Boehner, reflecting the concerns of Republicans from agricultural districts. “We understand the emergency that exists out in rural America and we’re concerned about addressing it as quickly as possible.” Boehner said he was working with Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, but Lucas did not appear to be fully in the loop.

“I’d like some clarification of what I’m picking up on the grapevine,” Lucas told Rogers, who writes: “Asked if he was preparing a new package, the Oklahoma Republican answered with some exasperation: ‘I’m not writing a package at this moment. I’m just trying to figure out what is going on for sure.’”

“Given the serious drought, there’s little question that the pressure from farm state lawmakers is growing,” Rogers reports. “And Boehner, who spent his early years on the House Agriculture Committee, seems eager to respond. Livestock producers are most vulnerable because of the loss of good grazing lands as well as higher prices for feed. The House and Senate farm bills promise disaster aid for the current year, but without action, these producers are left without the protection enjoyed by field crops, for example, covered by crop insurance. Two leadership aides said a full-year extension of the current farm program was being discussed. But this was news to the Senate Democratic leadership and could be a perilous path given the fact that it would mean extending the current system of direct cash payments to producers at a cost of close to $5 billion a year.” Read more here.

Reprinted with permission from The Rural Blog.  Article written by Al Cross for The Rural Blog. Al Cross, former Courier-Journal political writer, is director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues and The Rural Blog.

Farm bill update: good news first

There’s good news and there’s bad news out of the U.S. House of Representatves Committee on Agriculture. The Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act (FARRM) passed by a bipartisan 35-11 vote.

The committee rejected amendments to alter the no-cost sugar program and also voted not to remove the Dairy Market Stabilization Program (DMSP) from the new dairy program. The sugar industry generates $20 billion annually and creates 142,000 jobs. Dairy is a mainstay of agriculture in many states and eliminating the supply management provision would be disastrous, leading to a repeat of low prices the industry has seen in the past few years.

A recent National Farmers Union poll found that preserving conservation programs is a priority for farmers across the country. The committee did just that and in an effort to help local producers, the Act encourages federal nutrition program beneficiaries to use their benefits to purchase local and regional food. The committee also gave a thumbs up to the Risk Management Agency to complete its organic price series. A win for organic producers, ensuring that they are indemnified at organic market prices.

On the downside, the energy title received no mandatory funding. Discretionary funds are to be awarded annually by appropriation and lacks a secure multi-year funding mechanism to promote renewable energy investment.

Another step backward is the approval of an amendment weakening Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL). Consumers want to know where their food comes from and it’s a disappointing turn away from respecting the rights of American consumers.

However, the cruelest cuts of all were aimed at the nutrition title. America still faces economic challenges: $16 billion in cuts from such an important safety net for so many people is downright heartless and frankly, politically impractical. Senate leadership has made clear they are not agreeable to massive cuts in feeding programs for hungry families during these difficult times.

The current farm bill expires on September 30.

Woody Guthrie’s 100th birthday is Saturday; how about singing ‘This Land Is Your Land’ to mark it?

The 15th annual Woody Guthrie Folk Festival opens tomorrow in the singer-songwriter’s hometown of Okemah, Okla., and it will be a special one, running through the 100th anniversary of his birth on Saturday, July 14.

The Woody Guthrie Centennial website says, “His songs have run around the world like a fast train on a well oiled track. They’ve become the folk song standards of the nation, known and performed in many languages throughout the world. Pretty Boy Floyd,Pastures of PlentyHard Travelin’DeporteesRoll On Columbia,Vigilante Man and This Land Is Your Land are among the hundreds of his songs that have become staples in the canon of American music.”

You know what I’d like to hear on Saturday? The crowd at a Major League Baseball park singing “this Land is Your Land,” which is an aspirational anthem, not a celebratory one, as “The Star-Spangled Banner” is. We need to celebrate, but we also need to be a nation of shared aspirations. “This Land” would be especially appropriate at Yankee Stadium, next to “the New York island,” and in the city where Guthrie, who died in 1967, lived longest. But it sounds good anywhere. Sing it on Saturday!

Reprinted with permission from The Rural Blog.  Article written by Al Cross for The Rural Blog. Al Cross, former Courier-Journal political writer, is director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues and The Rural Blog.

Romancing Rural Votes…

The race is on for rural America’s support come November. Both campaigns have just about four months to woo voters in America’s non-metro areas. And both sides have specific campaign messages to induce small town and rural constituents to cast a ballot their way.

Former Massachusetts Governor Romney has been making the rounds, flipping flapjacks and posing with cows.  President Obama’s Rural Americans for Obama has launched this video.  Sure is getting hot out there.

The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett
William Whipple
Massachusetts:
Samuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
Matthew Thornton

Page URL: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html

U.S. National Archives & Records Administration
8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD, 20740-6001, • 1-86-NARA-NARA • 1-866-272-6272