Update on Local Farms, Food and Jobs Act

It’s growing season again – time to go out in search of farm markets and farm stands to purchase yummy local ingredients for your table. Besides treating your tasebuds to the freshest best tasting foods, supporting local farms and farmers keeps your food dollars in your community.

And that is exactly what the Local Farms, Foods and Jobs bill authored by Maine Congresswoman Chellie Pingree aims to do. A special thank you to my Congressman Richard E. Neal and Massachusetts Senator John Kerry and their staffs for listening and acting on behalf of local agriculture!  Congressman Neal has a long history of supporting local foods for local kitchens and that includes Farm to School programs. Look a little closer at today’s picture and you’ll see Congressman Neal (third in from the right) enjoying a fresh apple at a local school in his district!

Co-Sponsors as of May 17, 2012 for the Local, Farms, Food and Jobs Act (H.R. 3286, S. 1773) by state here.  If you do not see your U.S. Representative or Senator listed, click here to find their contact information. Write, call or email  to ask them to sign on. The future of local agriculture is in your hands!

Soldier On

Western Massachusetts is home to Soldier On. The Soldier On program operates two facilities. In Leeds, Massachusetts a 165-bed shelter is located in two buildings leased from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The Berkshire Veterans Residence in Pittsfield, Massachusetts provides transitional living space for 71 formerly homeless veterans. Both facilities are managed by formerly homeless veterans, a peer approach that clearly has advantages. The people served take active responsibility in creating and maintaining their living space.

On this Memorial Day weekend our nation honors the men and women who have protected and served. I don’t believe there is a better way to show our respect, care and appreciation for our veterans than to support Soldier On.

Back to the Future

Seventy-six years ago, Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt fought for re-election in a time of crisis. The question has been raised in today in moneylife magazine, Can Obama do a FDR?

Click on FDR to hear what President Roosevelt had to say about the forces behind inequity for hard-working Americans in 1936. I think you’ll agree it’s always good to review history when thinking through a question of such great importance to our nation and our people.

Just In: USDA Farm to School grant applications available

USDA request for applications (RFA) are now available for the new Farm to School grant program. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 is in its first funding cycle for grants planning or implementing new or expanded Farm to School programs. USDA expects to award up to $3.5 million to support access to local foods in eligible schools.

Read all about the grant process and download the RFA here.

According to the USDA, grant funds will be made available on a competitive basis, subject to availability of Federal funds. Applicants are encouraged to first submit a letter of intent and then apply for either a planning grant or an implementation grant. Planning grants are expected to range from $20,000 – $45,000 and represent approximately 25 percent of the total awards. Implementation grants are expected to range from $65,000 – $100,000 and represent approximately 75 percent of the total awards. Both grant types require a minimum 25% investment match with up to 75% of funding from Federal monies available.

Important dates:
May 15, 1 p.m. EST – Webinar (implementation grants)
May 17, 1 p.m. EST – Webinar (planning grants)
May 18 – Letter of Intent Deadline (suggested)
June 15 – Applications Due

This new funding mechanism offers an exciting opportunity for schools to participate more fully in accessing fresh, locally grown foods for students. A healthy win-win for communities and students!

Regional, political differences make passage of a new Farm Bill this year unlikely

The prospects for passing a new Fram Bill have dimmed this month, as regional divisions and partisanconflictover the federal budget have complicated negotiations, several members of Congress said while in their districts during the Easter recess.

“Southern farm interests and their champions on Capitol Hill put the rest of U.S. agriculture on notice at the end of last week that they won’t play second fiddle to the Midwest,” Agri-Pulse reports. “The lack of consensus among commodity groups on safety-net provisions” in the bill is the fault of corn and soybean interests, National Cotton Council CEO Mark Lange told cotton growers in Texas: “As long as the grains and oilseeds are trying to steal several hundreds of millions of dollars annually in support from rice, peanuts and cotton, we’re not going to speak with a single voice” on the bill, Lange told the Plains Cotton Growers in Lubbock.

Lange spoke on the same day that Southern farmers said at a House Agriculture Committee hearing in Jonesboro, Ark., “to reject a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to risk management when it drafts the next farm bill,” reports Agri-Pulse. (The weekly newsletter is subscription-only, but it offers a four-week trial subscription here.)

Also at the cotton growers’ meeting, Rep. Mike Conaway of Texas said Congress faces “a lot of struggles with the resources we’ll have available to write the farm bill. We also have a political environment that will make it difficult to do a stand-alone bill.” So Reports David Bennett of Delta Farm Press, noting that Conaway said no new bill passes before the end of September, when the current one is set to expire, the current one will be extended “probably for a year.”

Bennett also notes that Rep. Bill Owens of New York said a “Farm Bill is not expected to pass this year because of the November election and typical pace of government in Washington,” as reported by Denise Raymo of the Press Republican in Plattsburgh, N.Y. “Owens said both House Ag Committee Chair Frank Lucas and Senate Ag Committee Chair Collin Peterson have worked hard to bring the Farm Bill in as a logical spending plan, but it likely won’t go anywhere this year.”

Keith Good of the FarmPolicy blog notes a report from Carl Burnett Jr. of the Eagle-Gazette in Lancaster, Ohio: “Don’t expect anything major to be decided in Congress before the November election. That’s a message U.S. Rep. Steve Stivers presented to a group of farmers Thursday.”

Reprinted with permission from The Rural Blog.  Article written by Al Cross Al is a former Courier-Journal political writer, currently director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues and The Rural Blog.

Ranking Democrat on House Ag Committee says GOP plan cuts to ’50-50′ odds of Farm Bill in 2012

U.S. Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota, the ranking Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, told Mike Adams of AgriTalk that House Republicans’ budget outline “is going to cause big problems” for passage of a new Farm Bill this year. They are asking for a reconciliation process to avoid defense cuts, and they want them before writing of the bill begins, he said. He said Republicans are apparently going to ask for $8.2 billion in cuts, and as a result he thinks there’s only a “50-50″ chance of getting the bill passed this year.

“This is a reconciliation that’s not going to be done in the Senate,” Peterson told Adams. “This is being done strictly to get enough Republican votes to pass a budget, so it has no effect on anything at the end of the day, other than to cause a lot of trouble for the Ag Committee in the meantime.” He said there are rumors that Republicans won’t extend the current Farm Bill without insisting on further cuts, and he thinks approving the reconciliation without the Senate’s approval “is just going to almost guarantee that you’re not going to get a bill done.” (Read more)

Reprinted with permission from The Rural Blog.  Article written by Ivy Brashear for The Rural Blog. Al Cross, former Courier-Journal political writer, is director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues and The Rural Blog.

Building Rural-Urban Partnerships

A packed auditorium at the Museum of Science in Boston, Massachusetts was the scene: a big city venue for a Farm Bill Teach-in. This alone speaks volumes to the idea that when it comes to food policy and politics, we’re all in this together. The Farm Bill is really the Food Bill.  Keynoters at the Farm Bill Teach-in included U.S. Representative Chellie Pingree (D-ME) who serves on the House ag committee and NYU’s Marion Nestle, PhD and author of many award winning books on food politics.

Congresswoman Pingree’s presentation focused on her Local Farms, Food and Jobs Act. This bill would enact several initiatives that support local growers, specifically revamping a currently controversial crop insurance program and creating one more suited to helping organic and diversified farmers.

To date, it has attracted 68 co-sponsors in the House. Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) introduced a companion bill in the Senate, which currently has twelve co-sponsors. Farm Bill experts, Annette Higby, Policy Director of the New England Farmers Union, and Chris Coffin, New England Director of the American Farmland Trust reminded the audience to contact their U.S Senators and local U.S. Representatives.

Make your feelings known about the programs and bills you want your elected officials to support. It doesn’t matter on which side of the political aisle you sit, or what your particular interest is in the Farm Bill — from school lunch programs, local farmers markets, organic farming, food stamps, or ending corporate farm subsidies.

Raise your fork and your voice in solidarity with strengthening local food systems.

Last night in LaVista, Nebraska

National Farmers Union (NFU) opened its 110th Anniversary Convention last night. More than 500 Farmers Union members from across the country met at the LaVista Conference Center in LaVista, Neb., for the four-day event. This year’s convention theme is New Horizons for Agriculture.

“This is a critical year for agriculture as we work to complete the 2012 Farm Bill,” said Roger Johnson, president of National Farmers Union (pictured). “We must continue working to ensure that the next farm bill benefits family farmers and ranchers. We know it will be challenging to get everything that we need in this budget environment. That is why NFU worked with the University of Tennessee to study a Market-Driven Inventory System, which will provide farmers and ranchers with income stability and decrease the cost of the farm program to the federal government.”

Farmers Union presented Howard Buffett with a check for $55,193 for Feeding America. Last year, the Howard G. Buffett Foundation pledged to match every dollar donated by Farmers Union members to Feeding America, up to $50,000.

U.S. Rep. Colin Peterson (D-MN) also addressed Farmers Union members and discussed what he believed would happen this year with the farm bill and dairy policy. He described a new dairy policy that would take the volatility out of the dairy market and provide a safety net for small dairies.

Yesterday was the first of a four-day convention for NFU. Over the next few days, Farmers Union members will hear from speakers, go on agricultural tours, and vote on NFU policy for the coming year.

National Farmers Union has been working since 1902 to protect and enhance the economic well-being and quality of life for family farmers, ranchers and rural communities through advocating grassroots-driven policy positions adopted by its membership. RuralVotes has had the privilege of supporting the work done in all six New England states by Executive Director Annie Cheatham and the governing board of New England Farmers Union. Whatever state you’re from, we encourage you to check in with your local Farmers Union chapter.  Be part of the team and lend your local voice at the national table!

Enhanced by Zemanta

About changes to COOL

The following release came to us from the National Farmers Union about legislative changes to the country of origin labeling law.

We couldn’t agree more!

NFU Will Not Support Legislative Changes to COOL
WASHINGTON (Jan. 27, 2012) – National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson issued the following statement today to urging U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Ron Kirk to pursue a robust appeals process on the recent decision of the World Trade Organization (WTO) that ruled against the United States’ implementation of the country-of-origin-labeling (COOL) law:
“NFU has a proud record of supporting COOL. We were instrumental in getting the COOL laws passed in 2002 and again in 2008.
“We will oppose any attempt to change that law. Fortunately, the WTO decision against U.S. country-of-origin-labeling did not find fault with our law. It simply found fault with the rules and regulations which were used to implement the law.
“As the office of the USTR contemplates its approach to the WTO decision, we urge them to mount a robust and vigorous defense of COOL.
“We are aware that behind the scenes attempts at negotiating a settlement to the WTO decision have some stakeholders arguing that we must weaken our law. We strongly disagree and urge a fervent defense.
“Consumers have a right to know where their meat comes from – and they overwhelmingly want to know just that.”
The labeling law was passed as a part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and amended in 2008. COOL requires retailers to notify their customers of the source of certain foods. Canada and Mexico filed a complaint against the United States’ law, which led to the recent ruling. The deadline for filing an appeal to the WTO decision is March 23, 2012.

The Paradox of Obesity and Malnutrition

Today is Blog Action Day, an annual event in which tens of thousands of bloggers address a subject they have chosen by voting earlier in the year. This year’s subject is food.

By Miryam Ehrlich Williamson

A single glance at the photo of a skin-and-bones baby in the arms of a skin-and-bones mother is all it takes for the brain to call up the concept of malnutrition and its probable result, a miserable, painful death.

While we sympathize with people starving in Darfur, Sudan, and elsewhere in Africa, India, North Korea, and other nations under intolerable stress, we look around for someone to make the famine end, and then we realize we are the ones we are waiting for. If we don’t act, at least in telling our country’s leaders that they must act, we must assume that no one else will, and the people who stare at us through the camera lens will die because no one cares, or cares enough.

Malnutriton is easy to recognize in the stick-fiigure human beings we see on the nightly news. It’s much harder to identify malnutrition in the morbidly obese – people who weigh at least 100 pounds (45 kg) more than is good for them. People who are stirred by the sight of malnutrition in the painfully thin are often disgusted by the massive bodies of those who are obese by virtue of malnutrition.

I don’t mean to equate the plight of those suffering from famine with that of those suffering from an abundance of food that offers virtually no nourishment, only, and temporarily, a full belly. These are the malnourished people in the developed world, and the result of such malnutrition is also likely be a miserable, painful death.

In the case of those who are morbidly obese, death will take longer to come. It will likely come in the form of a heart attack or stroke, or the consequences of diabetes – heart failure, kidney failure, dementia caused by the deterioration of nerves and blood vessels in the brain among them.

How can it be that so many people in the world’s richest nations, where food is obscenely plentiful, can be both fat and malnourished? The answer is poverty. One-third of American adults (and thirty percent of American children) are obese. A far smaller percentage are morbidly obese, but no one seems to be keeping statistics to that fine a point. In America, sixteen percent of people live below the poverty line, and many more, while not officially in poverty take in too little money in the course of a week to be able to buy properly nourishing food, or even to live in a place where such food can be bought.

In America, the corner grocery store has all but disappeared, giving way to large supermarkets that serve a more affluent area in which most people must drive to buy their food. These are the stores that stock fresh meat, fruit, and vegetables – the foods we need to eat a healthful diet. Lacking automobiles or any other way to get to the supermarkets, people in the poorer neighborhoods must rely on convenience stores. These sell almost nothing but prepared foods, full of sugars and salt, starch and fat. And the poorest of the poor buy the cheapest foods they can find, mainly snack foods and cakes. These fill their bellies for a while, then soon leave those who eat them as hungry as before. So they eat more low-nutrition but cheap snacks and never experience the satisfaction of a nourishing meal. And the weight, born of sugars and salt, starches and fats, piles on.

In many, the result is akin to alcoholism – a never-ending craving to satisfy the itch that is addiction. It’s easy to look down on the alcoholic or person who is morbidly obese if you’ve never been in their place. The causes of alcoholism are several, including an inherited inability to process the sugars in alcohol efficiently – nobody’s fault. The causes of obesity are fewer, and generally come down to societal indifference to social and economic justice. That’s the fault of those who could object, but do not.

Ask yourself this: When was the last time you saw a person who was both morbidly obese and rich? Rich people don’t have to stuff themselves with food devoid of nutrients to stave off the pain of hunger. Poor people often do. Rich people can get their food from the best markets. Poor people buy from convenience stores.

And the point is this: There is no excuse in rich, developed nations for the disparity we find between rich and poor. No excuse at all, except that the rich people like it that way. And they have the money to spend to ensure that the wealth gap, and the nutrition gap, don’t go away.

They can make it so, that is, unless those of us who are fortunate enough, though we’re not rich, to maintain a decent level of nutrition and, thus, of energy, say it can’t be that way any more.

We have only to look around us to see plentiful examples of peaceful objections to the way things are. In the name of humanity, we must.

Click here to sample today’s blogs.